Friday, October 2, 2009

The People of the World Are Literally Eating Dirt to Survive

Poor Haitians Resort to Eating Dirt


Jonathan M. Katz in Port-au-Prince, Haiti

National Geographic, Associated Press


It was lunchtime in one of Haiti's worst slums, and Charlene Dumas was eating mud.

With food prices rising, Haiti's poorest can't afford even a daily plate of rice, and some must take desperate measures to fill their bellies.

Charlene, 16 with a month-old son, has come to rely on a traditional Haitian remedy for hunger pangs: cookies made of dried yellow dirt from the country's central plateau.

The mud has long been prized by pregnant women and children here as an antacid and source of calcium. But in places such as Cité Soleil, the oceanside slum where Charlene shares a two-room house with her baby, five siblings, and two unemployed parents, cookies made of dirt, salt, and vegetable shortening have become a regular meal.

"When my mother does not cook anything, I have to eat them three times a day," Charlene said. Her baby, named Woodson, lay still across her lap, looking even thinner than the slim 6 pounds, 3 ounces (2.7 kilograms, 85 grams) he weighed at birth.

Though she likes their buttery, salty taste, Charlene said the cookies also give her stomach pains. "When I nurse, the baby sometimes seems colicky too," she said.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Video Gamers to Pilot USAF Aircraft

The success of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles like the Predator means the US Air Force will, thi...

The success of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles like the Predator means the US Air Force will, this year, train more virtual pilots than real pilots (Image: General Atomics)
Image Gallery (2 images)

There was once a great Far Side cartoon that had ‘hopeful parents’ imagining a newspaper full of Help Wanted ads for skilled video game players. Well, it looks like Gary Larson might have been more prescient than he imagined. The US Air Force has just revealed that, this year, it will train more ‘pilots’ to remotely operate unmanned aircraft than pilots to fly fighters and bombers.

This will come as a no surprise to regular Gizmag readers, who have seen more and more about Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) over the last few years. (Confusingly, the military prefers to refer to them as Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), which is intended to include ground stations as well.)
Lt. Gen. David Deptula revealed at the briefing on July 23 that high- and medium-altitude UAV overseas combat missions have increased more than 600 percent during the past six years. At present, the Air Force has 35 Predator and Reaper UAVs over Iraq and Afghanistan, each of which is a combat mission that keeps an aircraft aloft 24 hours a day.

Monday, September 21, 2009

G20 & the New Economic World Order

U.S. to push for new economic world order at G20


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States will urge world leaders this week to launch a new push in November to rebalance the world economy, but there are doubts national governments will bow to external advice.

A document outlining the U.S. position ahead of the September 24-25 Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh said exporters, which include China, Germany and Japan, should consume more, while debtors like the United States ought to boost savings.

"The world will face anemic growth if adjustments in one part of the global economy are not matched by offsetting adjustments in other parts," said the document, which was obtained by Reuters on Monday.
The framework drafted by U.S. policy makers foresaw analysis of G20 members' economic policies by the International Monetary Fund to figure out if they were consistent with better balanced growth.

"We call on our finance ministers to launch the new framework by November," the document said, signaling a determined effort to maintain momentum for change created by last year's global financial crisis.

Monday, August 3, 2009

Preparations for Domestic Military Operations Undeniably Underway



If you still have a rational cell left in your head, you're probably mortified after watching this marketing video for the National Guard 31E Internment/Resettlement Specialist position. During the course of your repeated jaw drops, you probably didn't notice the black uniform police-state regalia at 1:22-1:24. You may have doubts as to whether or not this is for domestic application, however if we listen clearly to the oration during the 31E presentation, we can deductively reason that black uniforms would not be used in foreign engagements. Even more devastating is the final word, telling the recruits that they will learn and uphold the Army motto "Of the troops and for the troops". Indeed these usurpers of sovereignty are dead wrong for we shall forever be a country "for the people, by the people". Patriots sound the alarm, the enemy has breached the gates.

Judge Rules to Suspend Constitutional Due Process Because of Swine Flu Threat

Judge: Swine flu is reason to suspend constitutional rights
Delays caused by lockdown are costing thousands of dollars, inconveniencing jurors.
By LARRY WELBORN
The Orange County Register

SANTA ANA – A Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday that there is legal justification to keep the Central Men’s Jail under medical quarantine – at least for a couple of days – to control a swine flu outbreak.

Judge Thomas Goethals said the “significant medical public health event” in the men’s jail is good cause to temporarily suspend constitutional guarantees to speedy trials, preliminary hearings and arraignments for some criminal case defendants.

He made his ruling over the objections of the county public defender’s office and the alternate defender’s office after a special 90-minute hearing on the status of the health scare in the main men’s jail, which usually houses 800 to 900 inmates.

But Goethals said the exception to speedy court appearances will only be in effect through Thursday, by which time the quarantine of the jail may be lifted. He said he will preside over another hearing Thursday if medical authorities continue the quarantine.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Russia Returns to Red Armband Peoples Patrols



International Herald Tribune
In Russia, a nostalgic return to public patrols
Tuesday, March 24, 2009

MOSCOW: Moscow's typically traffic-clogged central thoroughfare was jammed this day with people, basking in a rare late-winter sun as a fire department marching band in lime-green uniforms and shiny gold helmets warmed up for a spring festival parade.

As the band prepared to march, Vladimir K. Kazerzin moved in with his men to help clear a path through the crowd. Mr. Kazerzin is a former philosophy teacher, not a police officer, and that is the point. He heads a contingent of volunteer police officers, called druzhiniki, who patrol with increasing frequency in the capital alongside the professionals to bolster their ranks and, at times, counter their belligerence.

"Look at that sad looking soldier in comparison with my guys," Mr. Kazerzin said with a glimmer of pride, pointing out a particularly morose conscript soldier working crowd control along with his volunteers. Nearby, Moscow police officers barked aggressively under their big fur hats at the crowd to clear out, prompting snarls of indignation.

Meanwhile, Mr. Kazerzin's men, mostly college students in red armbands and with piercings glittering in their ears, smiled and chatted with passersby, while directing them to spots where they could watch the parade without getting in the way.

For those who recall life in the Soviet Union, the druzhiniki are often a nostalgic reminder of the citizen patrols of students and grandmothers walking the streets in red armbands at the behest of the Communist Party to keep a lookout for hooligans and petty criminals.

Though their numbers have dwindled since the Soviet collapse, the government is working to revive the druzhiniki in part to help law enforcement agencies combat what officials fear will be a spike in crime and public disorder amid the growing unemployment and rising prices of the economic crisis. A group of lawmakers in the Russian Parliament is pushing legislation that could enhance the authority of existing volunteer patrols.

Today, these volunteer groups appear little different from the civilian neighborhood watch organizations found in many countries. But in Russia they offer a rare example of volunteerism in a society that remains largely skeptical of civic groups after years of forced social activism under the Soviets, and fears of a return to the days of civilian informers.

But the groups' proponents dismiss such fears. "When it comes to protecting children and driving teenaged hooligans from the playground, people will come together," said Vasily I. Solmin, a former submariner in the Pacific Fleet, who now heads a group of druzhiniki in Moscow.

Druzhiniki all but disappeared after the Russian government withdrew its support with the collapse of the Soviet Union, but re-emerged in force in Moscow following terrorist attacks on two apartment buildings that killed hundreds in 1999, said Irina Svyatenko, a member of the Moscow city legislature.

"At that time, people just decided to start patrolling their neighborhoods," she said. "They did not ask anyone for permission, and there was no government initiative. People just decided that this was needed."

There are now as many as 17,000 volunteers in Moscow and units in more than 40 other regions of Russia, said Vyacheslav I. Khalamov, an assistant to the chief of the Moscow druzhiniki. In the capital, volunteers help the police with crowd control at major public events like concerts, sporting events, public festivals and protests.

A favorite among the druzhiniki is working the annual Fourth of July reception put on by the U.S. Embassy here. "They even feed us and sometimes give us a bottle of beer," Mr. Kazerzin said.

In Soviet days, he said, they could detain people on misdemeanor charges and write traffic tickets and were compensated if injured while on patrol. For the most part, the current druzhiniki get little outside of free public transport and the red armband.

"We should be working on those issues that the police simply don't have time for, like small street crimes and crime prevention," Mr. Khalamov said.

The new legislation, which will likely come up for hearings in Parliament in coming months, would institute the druzhiniki on a federal level and allow them to impose fines for failure to obey their orders and provide compensation for injuries suffered while on patrol. Legislators have even debated the possibility of allowing the volunteers to carry weapons like batons or stun guns.

"We are now giving society a chance through this structure to fight against crime, help protect public order and, most importantly, to guarantee security in one's own backyard," said Vladimir A. Vasilyev, the head of the Security Committee in Parliament.

Critics, however, worry that this emboldened civilian police force could easily succumb to the substantial corruption that already pervades law enforcement agencies in Russia.

"If today we already have problems controlling our police, what happens when we create a far less trained, less disciplined and less controlled structure?" said Aleksandr Cherkasov, from the Moscow-based human rights organization Memorial.

Not so, said Valery I. Maximov, a retired police officer who now commands a 126-member regiment of volunteers in Moscow. He argues that since the volunteers are required to patrol with the police their presence can actually dissuade officers from yielding to corruption.

"When they patrol along with police," he said, "I know that the officer will not take a bribe because the druzhinik is watching."

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

China Assuages The Internet, Blocks YouTube

"Unafraid" China apparently fears YouTube
Source: Reuters
Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:26pm EDT


Photo
BEIJING (Reuters) - China is not afraid of the Internet, its Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday, even as access to the popular video sharing site YouTube was apparently blocked.

YouTube, owned by search giant Google Inc, has been unavailable for users in China, which filters the Internet for content critical of the Communist Party, since late on Monday.

"Many people have a false impression that the Chinese government fears the Internet. In fact it is just the opposite," Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang told reporters.

He said he did not know about YouTube being blocked.

A Google spokesman confirmed that access to the video site has been blocked in China over the past 24 hours.

"YouTube is currently blocked in China. We don't know the reason for the blockage, but are working as quickly as possible to restore access to our users in China," said spokesman Scott Rubin.

Rubin would not comment on whether YouTube has contacted the Chinese authorities to confirm it has officially been blocked or if it is a technical problem.

Both Google and YouTube have previously been blocked in China for brief periods, according to the company. In the past Chinese authorities have blocked specific videos.

Access to YouTube had been spotty earlier in March, the one-year anniversary of widespread protests by Tibetans against Chinese rule.

Qin said China's 300 million Internet users and 100 million blogs showed "China's Internet is open enough, but also needs to be regulated by law in order to prevent the spread of harmful information and for national security."

An Internet crackdown that began in January has closed hundreds of Chinese sites, including a popular blog hosting site and several sites popular with Tibetans.

It has been described by analysts as another step in the Party's battle to stifle dissent in a year of sensitive anniversaries, including the 20th anniversary of the government's bloody crackdown on the pro-democracy Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.

YouTube, which has country-specific sites in 23 countries, has in the past been blocked in certain countries, including Turkey and Thailand in disputes over specific videos.


Direct Link to Article:

http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE52N1VN20090324

Monday, March 23, 2009

Another Trillion Dollars Sinks Us to $11 Trillion in Bailouts!

NWOblogger.com Original Article

In another brazen move by the Wall Street Bankers using their strong arm in the Treasury Department, a plan has been approved to purchase ONE TRILLION DOLLARS or more of toxic bank assets. The proposed plan includes the proviso that the monies offered be used for mortgages OR for the buyout of consequential securities otherwise known as "toxic derivatives".

The plan will offer investors the opportunity to purchase margin assets at approximately 5% of their reduced value with the Government (in actuality We the People) taking on the remaining 95% of debt and risk. These "loans" will be guaranteed against "any losses", presumably this means that any margin below the original 5% investment will be reimbursed to the investor.


The proposal sounds quite lucrative to investors, but what does it mean for the economy and the stock markets?

A likely result of this new trillion dollar policy will be an even larger derivatives bubble. Investors may clamor to wedge themselves into these enticing margin loan positions, stacking their clams, and waiting for the deluge to wash over the markets revealing the New World Financial Order.

As investors wait for these margin investments to ripen into profits, side-betting opportunists will invariably try to add their own higher and more unstable layers to an already teetering house of cards with securities and derivatives based on the margin investments.

One thing is for sure, the American Peoples' clams lean on the house of cards with delicate precision and the derivatives are like a tornado wind destined to lay ruin to all.

HOW IT WILL WORK IN PRACTICE
- Bank seeks to sell pool of mortgages worth $100
- Private auction decides that asset is now worth $84
- Private investor and government put up $6 each
- They then borrow remaining $72 from government
- That loan is guaranteed against any losses
- If asset is later sold at higher price, government makes profit and private investor pays back loan and pockets profit.
- If asset is sold at lower price, government and private investors could lose initial investment.
Source: US Treasury
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7958501.stm

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Obama's Cabinet Yields Nothing But Rancid Nuts and Rotten Fruits

Obama CIO a Confessed Petty Thief



Blogosphere surfaces 12-year-old guilty plea

America's first CIO once pleaded guilty to a petty theft charge, according to Maryland state records.

Vivek Kundra is currently on leave (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/13/vivek_leave/) from his federal CIO post, after one of his former employees was arrested for alleged IT bribery.

Kundra was tapped for the newly formed CIO position on March 5, after almost two years as chief technology officer for the local Washington, D.C. government.

Just seven days after the appointment, a manager in the D.C. CTO office was arrested on charges of bribery, conspiracy, money laundering, and conflict of interest. Forty-year-old Yusuf Acar is suspected of soliciting and accepting bribes in exchange for IT contracts.

Following the arrest, the White House said that Kundra had been put on leave - though federal authorities have told several news sources that he is not part of the investigation into Acar's behavior. According to the White House, he is on leave due to "an abundance of caution."

Now, the blogosphere has turned up Maryland state records showing that Kundra pleaded guilty to a sub-$300 theft charge in 1997. The arrest was first noticed by the Hot Air Blog (http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/kundras-record/) and was soon trumpeted by Valleywag (http://valleywag.gawker.com/5171500/barack-obamas-cio-a-confessed-thief) and, yes, Fox News (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/17/white-house-information-officer-committed-petty-theft-years-ago/).

The White House has yet to respond to our request for comment. Gary Segal, the lawyer who represented Kundra after his 1997 arrest, responded only to say "I'm sorry but there is nothing I can say about this matter."

After pleading guilty to petty theft, Kundra received "supervised probation" for less than a month and a fine of $500. $400 of that was suspended. ®

ABC News Mocks "Conspiracy Theorists", Acknowledges Elite Organization

Conspiracy Theorists Scrutinize Obama Ties

The highest levels of the Obama administration are infested with members of a shadowy, elitist cabal intent on installing a one-world government that subverts the will of the American people.

It sounds crazy, but that’s what a group of very persistent conspiracy theorists insists, and they point to President Obama’s nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, as the latest piece of evidence supporting their claims.

It turns out that Sebelius - like top administration economists Timothy Geithner, Larry Summers and Paul Volcker, as well as leading Obama diplomats Richard Holbrooke and Dennis Ross - is a Bilderberger. That is, she is someone who has participated in the annual invitation-only conference held by an elite international organization known as the Bilderberg group.

The group, which takes its name from the Dutch hotel where it held its first meeting in 1954, exists solely to bring together between 100 and 150 titans of politics, finance, military, industry, academia and media from North America and Western Europe once a year to discuss world affairs. It doesn’t issue policy statements or resolutions, nor does it hold any events other than an annual meeting.

Past participants have included Margaret Thatcher, who attended the 1975 meeting at Turkey’s Golden Dolphin Hotel, former media mogul Conrad Black, who has been to more than a dozen conferences, and Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, King Juan Carlos of Spain and top officials of BP, IBM, Barclays and the Bank of England.

It is precisely that exclusive roster of globally influential figures that has captured the interest of an international network of conspiracists, who for decades have viewed the Bilderberg conference as a devious corporate-globalist scheme.




The fulminating is aggravated by Obama's preference for surrounding himself with well-credentialed, well-connected, and well-traveled elites. His personnel choices have touched a populist, even paranoid nerve among those who are convinced powerful elites and secret societies are moving the planet toward a new world order.

Their worldview, characterized by a deep and angry suspicion of the ruling class rather than any prevailing partisan or ideological affiliation, is widely articulated on overnight AM radio shows and a collection of Internet websites.

The video sharing website YouTube alone is home to thousands of Bilderberg-related videos.

“I don’t laugh at the people who claim that they understand the connections, but I’ve never really spent much time tracing that through,” said Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a former presidential candidate whose libertarian sensibilities have made him a darling of the Bilderberg conspiracists.

“The one thing that concerns me is that the people who surround Obama or Bush generally come from the same philosophic viewpoint and they have their organizations - they have the Trilateral Commission, the CFR [Council on Foreign Relations] and the Bilderbergers, and they’ve been around a long time. And my biggest concern is what they preach: Keynesian economics and interventionism and world planning,” he said.

While it's easy to dismiss the Bilder-busters as cranks, these voices have a way of making themselves heard on the margins of the debate in ways that can prove to be a real, if minor, distraction to Obama’s political team. Bill Clinton had trouble shaking rumors that he was behind a shady criminal syndicate operating out of the Mena airport. George W. Bush was sometimes portrayed as the puppet of clandestine Middle Eastern oil interests.

Obama’s selection of numerous Bilderbergers for key posts “certainly would verify their suspicions,” said Paul, referring to fears of the group’s influence.

“And I don’t think it’s just Obama. Whether t’s the Republicans or the Democrats - Goldman Sachs generally has somebody in treasury. And the big banks generally have somebody in the Federal Reserve. And they’re international people, too. And they’re probably working very hard this weekend, with the G20. And they get involved in the IMF. But that is their stated goal. They do believe in a powerful centralized government and we believe in the opposite.”

One popular website, “Prison Planet,” greeted Sebelius’ nomination with the headline “Obama Picks Bilderberger for Health Secretary.”

It’s obvious why Bilderberg is a frequent target of conspiracy theorists, who’ve credited it with anointing aspiring presidents, selecting their running mates, creating the European Union and instigating the war in Iraq and the bombing of Serbia, among other coups.

Bilderberg meetings are closed to the press, participants are asked not to publicly discuss the proceedings and the attendee list is only occasionally released. As a result, the group has come to be viewed as a more publicity-shy cousin to the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations - other influential international think tanks that are staples of fringe group conversation.

Unlike Bilderberg, though, those organizations have opened their proceedings to public scrutiny, maintain websites and have long listed their members.

The Bilderberg group, in a rare press release last year, laid out a benign if vague mission: creating “a better understanding of the complex forces and major trends affecting Western nations.”

“Bilderberg is a small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and mutual understanding enhanced,” read the press release, which noted that a list of participants would be available by phone request between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on the second and third days of the conference.

The Bilderberg conspiracists first pounced on the Obama connection during the 2008 campaign, when news leaked in May that the candidate, who at the time was closing in on the Democratic presidential nomination, had initially tapped former Fannie Mae chairman Jim Johnson, a top Bilderberger, to help him select a running mate.

IRS filings show that Johnson as recently as 2006 was the treasurer of a non-profit group called American Friends of Bilderberg. The group has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to pay for meetings--including $125,000 in total contributions from Bilderberg stalwarts Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller in 2005 and 2006 plus $25,000 in 2005 from the Washington Post, whose chairman Don Graham has attended in the past.

Johnson did not return a message inquiring about his role at Bilderberg.

“The news further puts to rest any delusions that Bilderberg is a mere talking shop where no decisions are made,” reported Prison Planet. “It also ridicules once again any notion that an Obama presidency would bring ‘change’ to the status quo of America being ruled by an unelected corporate and military-industrial complex elite.”

One month later, in June, Johnson was joined at the 2008 Bilderberg meeting by Geithner, Holbrooke, Summers and Ross, as well as Obama’s first choice for HHS secretary, Tom Daschle, and Sebelius, who at the time was included on some short lists of prospective Obama running mates and who also attended the 2007 meeting in Istanbul, Turkey.

According to the Bilderberg press release, the meeting was designed to “deal mainly with a nuclear free world, cyber terrorism, Africa, Russia, finance, protectionism, US-EU relations, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam and Iran.” Approximately two-thirds of the 140 expected attendees came from Europe, according to the release, and the rest from North America.

Had the meeting been held outsie the United States, that might have been the end of the Obama angle. But the conference, which took place from June 5 through 8, was held at a heavily guarded hotel in Chantilly, Va. in suburban Washington-coincidentally overlapping with an Obama campaign event in the area.

While Obama’s schedule indicated he was to fly home to Chicago for the weekend-and journalists were herded on a campaign plane under the impression they were headed there along with Obama-the future president slipped away for a private meetings and never actually boarded the flight. As it turned out, Obama secretly met that evening with Hillary Rodham Clinton in Washington, D.C., but not before raising alarms among the Bilder-busters, who were convinced something was rotten in Chantilly.

Prison Planet connected the dots and concluded Obama and Clinton met at the Bilderberg meeting, declaring that “the complete failure of the mainstream media to report on the fact, once again betrays the super-secretive nature and influential reputation that the 54-year-old organization still maintains.”

“It is now seems increasingly likely that the secret meetings with Bilderberg this weekend will herald the decision to name Hillary Clinton as Obama's VP candidate,” predicted a sister site, Infowars.net.

Even the snarky D.C.-based Wonkette blog weighed in, half-seriously positing that “really, it sounds like” Obama and Clinton rendezvoused “at that creepy Bilderberg Group meeting, which is happening now, and which is so secret that nobody will admit they’re going, even though everybody who is anybody goes to Bilderberg.”

Curiously, though, the episode wasn’t the first time a Bilderberg meeting intersected with vice presidential selection machinations.

In 2004, both Time magazine and the New York Times noted that then-Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C) had impressed Bilderbergers at that year’s conference in Stresa, Italy-roughly one month prior to his selection as Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) running mate-- when Edwards debated Republican Ralph Reed. Then, as in 2008, Jim Johnson led the vice presidential vetting.

Time reported that then-Sen. Jon Corzine (D-N.J.) and Holbrooke attended and called Kerry “with rave reviews” about Edwards' debate skills.

In its tick-tock of the vice-presidential selection process, the New York Times also noted the Bilderberg effect.

"His performance at Bilderberg was important," a friend of Kerry told the Times. "He reported back directly to Kerry. There were other reports on his performance. Whether they reported directly or indirectly, I have no doubt the word got back to Mr. Kerry about how well he did."

An attendee of the 2004 meeting dismissed the notion that Edwards’ Bilderberg performance helped land him on the Democratic ticket.

“It wasn’t because of his performance at the meeting - he was at the meeting because he was going to get picked” said the attendee, who did not want to be identified breaching Bilderberg’s off-the-record rule. “He was there as a surrogate for Kerry” and to boost his foreign policy bona fides, said the attendee.

Either way, the attendee contended, the Bilderberg conspiracy theories don’t make sense on their face, if only because the wide array of ideologies represented would make it difficult to reach consensus.

“There were so many different people there with so many different viewpoints that it belied the opportunity to really conspire, because obviously a Kissinger and a [prominent neoconservative Richard] Perle are going to come down in a very different place than say a Holbrooke or a Johnson,” the attendee said.

Besides, the attendee observed, it’s almost impossible to name a Bilderberger-free Cabinet.

“You’d be hard pressed to find an administration that hasn’t reahed into those ranks into the last 20, 30, 40 years."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/15/politics/politico/main4866504.shtml

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Southeast Asian Union In Near Future?

International Herald Tribune

International Herald Tribune
Southeast Asian Nations talk of economic union

Bloomberg News
Monday, March 2, 2009

Southeast Asian governments want to speed up the formation of an economic group modeled on the European Union as the global recession slows their export-driven economies.

Leaders from the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations gathered in Thailand over the weekend for their annual meeting, and signed trade deals and agreements to form an integrated economic community, without a common currency, by 2015.

But analysts said that absent from the agenda were the concessions they said were necessary to increase growth in the region.

"Asean's biggest problem is that individual members haven't been willing to sacrifice for the common good," said Michael Montesano, a visiting research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore. "Every European Union member has given up sovereignty to be part of a stronger union, and we haven't seen that in Asean."

Wide economic disparity among Asean members has hindered the region's ability to leverage its market of 570 million people and compete for investments with China and India, the world's fastest growing economies. Thailand's prime minister, Abhisit Vejjajiva, who led the meeting, called on the bloc to "accelerate" the formation of an "attractive single market."



Southeast Asian leaders agree that closer regional integration would help growth, Thailand's finance minister, Korn Chatikavanij, said in an interview. Still, the large differences in wealth among Asean members make it "difficult to create common standards because our national standards remain so far apart," he said.

The push for more integration comes at a time when the European Union is straining under the pressures created by a similar disparity in the strength of its constituent economies.

Multinational companies have scaled back spending because of the global recession, leading to fiercer competition among governments looking to attract investment and create jobs.

China Recovering, Premier Says

China's economy has shown some signs of recovery after the government put into place its 4 trillion yuan ($585 billion) economic stimulus package, Premier Wen Jiabao said.

"The government's measures to tackle the financial crisis have shown preliminary results," Wen said during an online chat with the public on the government's Web site on Sunday. He cited rising loans, retail sales in January and growing power output and consumption since the middle of February.

China's economy, the world's third largest after those of the United States and Japan, expanded 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter, the slowest in seven years.

China's consumer spending jumped 18 percent in January, bank loans surged and power output and consumption regained growth since the middle of February, Wen said.

Still, he cautioned that the positive data might be temporary.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Swiss Banks No Longer Guarantee Impunity for Petit Elite

SPIEGEL ONLINE
02/20/2009 10:44 AM
UBS
The End of Swiss Banking as We Knew it?

By Stanley Reed

Swiss bank UBS has ageed to provide the US government with the identities of and account information for certain American customers of UBS's cross-border business "who appear to have committed tax fraud or the like." As much as $14.8 billion in assets may be involved.

In 2005 I interviewed Peter Wuffli, then the CEO of Swiss Bank UBS. I asked him how he felt about Swiss bank accounts being used by citizens of other countries to hide funds from the taxman. This is how he responded:

Swiss banking giant UBS has agreed to turnover customer data to the US.
REUTERS/Stefan Wermuth

Swiss banking giant UBS has agreed to turnover customer data to the US.
"We have a very clear distinction between tax fraud, which is a criminal offense, and tax avoidance, which is not a criminal offense."

For UBS and other Swiss banks this sort of thinking has justified allowing the wealthy and not-so-wealthy of the world to use Swiss financial institutions to hide money away from the prying eyes of tax men everywhere.

Now, that lucrative practise, which has contributed richly to the cozy, lakeside splendor of Zurich and Geneva, the main Swiss banking centers, is very much under threat. Under a deferred prosecution agreement, UBS has ageed to provide the US government with the identities of and account information for, certain US customers of UBS's cross-border business "who appear to have committed tax fraud or the like."

UBS also has agreed to pay $780 million in disgorgement of profits from maintaining cross-border accounts, as well as unpaid taxes associated with fraudulent sham nominee and offshore structures.



According to a statement from the US Attorney of the Southern District of Florida in Miami, when UBS bought its Paine Webber brokerage in 2000, the bank voluntarily agreed to report to the Internal Revenue Service income for its US clients. Instead, the document says, certain UBS executives helped clients set up new accounts in the names of nominees and/or sham entities. This device was used by UBS to justify evading its reporting obligations, the statement says.

With a large US brokerage and investment banking business, UBS was extraordinarily reckless. These actions, knowledge of which seemed to go quite high if not to the top of the bank, put all of these activities in danger. "It is apparent that as an organization we made mistakes and that our control systems were inadequate," CEO Marcel Rohner said in a statement.

While its not clear how many accounts will be subject to this agreement, American clients must be quaking in their boots. Some have already been pursuing settlements with the IRS. Tax-evading clients from other countries, notably Germany, and the Swiss private banking industry that thrives on their stashed wealth must also be very worried. If the US can successfully pressure UBS into revealing sensitive information on clients, then other jurisdictions may also hope to be successful.

UBS is trying to limit the number of accounts it will be forced to reveal. The US government has filed a civil suit asking a court to order UBS to disclose all secret accounts of US customers. According to the lawsuit, as many as 52,000 US customers hid their UBS accounts from the government. As much as $14.8 billion in assets may be involved. UBS says it will fight the suit.

Peter Kurer, who took over as Chairman of UBS from Marcel Ospel last year commented: "Client confidentiality, to which UBS remains committed, was never designed to protect fraudulent acts or the identity of clients, who, with the active asistance of bank personnel, misused the confidentiality protections..."

Maybe so, but it is difficult not to think that UBS and other Swiss banks are more and more going to be forced to earn their living from providing superior wealth management and other services, not just rely on the attractions of secrecy. UBS has said in the past that it is committed to doing just that, but some of the bank's executives obviously couldn't resist the easy money available from aiding tax evasion.

Reed is London bureau chief for BusinessWeek.

URL:

* http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,608866,00.html





Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Secret Society Skull & Bones Sued in Federal Court

Geronimo's kin sue Skull and Bones over remains

Wed Feb 18, 5:36 PM EST

Geronimo's descendants have sued Skull and Bones — the secret society at Yale University linked to presidents and other powerful figures — claiming that its members stole the remains of the legendary Apache leader decades ago and have kept them ever since.

The federal lawsuit filed in Washington on Tuesday — the 100th anniversary of Geronimo's death — also names the university and the federal government.

Geronimo's great-grandson Harlyn Geronimo said his family believes Skull and Bones members took some of the remains in 1918 from a burial plot in Fort Sill, Okla., to keep in its New Haven clubhouse, a crypt. The alleged graverobbing is a longstanding legend that gained some validity in recent years with the discovery of a letter from a club member that described the theft.

"I believe strongly from my heart that his spirit was never released," Harlyn Geronimo said.

Both Presidents Bush, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry and many others in powerful government and industry positions are members of the society, which is not affiliated with the university.

After years of famously fighting the U.S. and Mexican armies, Geronimo and 35 warriors surrendered to Gen. Nelson A. Miles near the Arizona-New Mexico border in 1886. Geronimo was eventually sent to Fort Sill and died at the Army outpost of pneumonia in 1909.

According to lore, members of Skull and Bones — including former President George W. Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush — dug up his grave when a group of Army volunteers from Yale were stationed at the fort during World War I, taking his skull and some of his bones.

Harlyn Geronimo, 61, wants those remains and any held by the federal government turned over to the family so they can be reburied near the Indian leader's birthplace in southern New Mexico's Gila Wilderness.

Their lawsuit also names President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Army Secretary Pete Geren as defendants.

"I want them to understand we mean business," said Harlyn Geronimo, who lives in New Mexico. "We're very serious. We're tired of waiting and we're coming after them."





Neither members of Skull and Bones, who closely guard their secrecy, nor the Russell Trust Association, the organization's business arm for tax purposes, could not be reached for comment.

Justice Department spokesman Andrew Ames said the government will "review the complaint and respond in court at the appropriate time."

Fort Sill spokeswoman Nancy Elliot declined to discuss the lawsuit, but said officials have always maintained there is no evidence supporting the descendants' claims.

Yale officials declined to comment Wednesday, saying they had not yet seen the lawsuit. Spokesman Tom Conroy noted the Skull and Bones crypt is not on Yale property.

Membership into Skull and Bones marks the elite of the elite at the Ivy League school. Only 15 Yale seniors are asked to join each year.

Members swear an oath of secrecy about the group and its strange rituals, which include devotion to the number "322" and initiation rites such as confessing sexual secrets and kissing a skull. The atmosphere makes Skull and Bones favorite fodder for conspiracy theorists.

Its most enduring story is the one concerning Geronimo's remains, and in 2005, Yale historian Marc Wortman discovered a letter written in 1918 from one Skull and Bones member to another that seemed to lend validity to the tale.

The letter, sent to F. Trubee Davison by Winter Mead, said Geronimo's skull and other remains were taken from the leader's burial site, along with several pieces of tack for a horse.

"The skull of the worthy Geronimo the Terrible, exhumed from its tomb at Fort Sill by your club and Knight Haffuer, is now safe inside the T — together with is well worn femurs, bit and saddle horn," Mead wrote.

Wortman, however, has said he is skeptical the bones are actually Geronimo's.

Geronimo's descendants say in their lawsuit that they want to uncover any information that people know, but have been keeping to themselves.

"To assure that all existing remains of Geronimo and funerary objects are recovered by Geronimo's linear descendants, the Order of Skull and Bones and Yale University must account for any such articles that are or have been in their possession, or on their property, and persons with knowledge must provide any facts known to them concerning the claims," the descendants' lawsuit says.

If the bones at Yale aren't those of Geronimo, Harlyn Geronimo believes they belonged to one of the Apache prisoners who died at Fort Sill. He said they should still be returned.

Harlyn Geronimo wrote to President George W. Bush in 2006, seeking his help in recovering the bones. He thought that since the president's grandfather was allegedly one of those who helped steal the bones, the president would want to help return them.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Monday, February 9, 2009

Symbolism of Divinity, Surrepititious Photographic Propaganda in President's Photo










NWOblogger.com Exclusive

In an article today out of the London Telegraph entitled "Barack Obama warns economic stimulus delay would bring 'disaster'" the above photo of the newly elected president (left) appeared saliently as a breaker between text of the article. This angle and orientation of this photo is induces Pavlovian responses in the subconscience with its unmistakable messianic motif.

Is someone out there trying to implant the view that Barack H. Obama is the next Jesus H. Christ? As a largely Christian faith based nation, the implications of the president being presented with interlaces of messianic propaganda is indeed worrisome. Perhaps this photo is just an anomaly, perhaps it is something more. We leave such judgments to the discretion of our humble readers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/4571678/Barack-Obama-warns-economic-stimulus-delay-would-bring-disaster.html

Financial Vampirism Continues, Wall Street Sucks Final Assets From America

Bailouts, rescue packages, troubled asset relief programs, loans, or whatever idioms the financial vultures use describe their looting of the American people's treasury, are weakening the body of America to the point of hastening collapse.

The 2008-2009 banker's plot for the liquidation and consolidation of American interests is accelerating with extreme prejudice. Under the Obama Administration with its hardened financial turncoats, two of which are former New York Federal Reserve presidents, the 2009 financial putsch is now proceeding into its final phase. The below article featured in today's edition of Forbes online explains the next installment of the financial putsch.

Forbes.com

Business In The Beltway
Washington's Trillion-Dollar Week
Brian Wingfield, 02.08.09, 8:27 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- If all goes well for President Barack Obama, this could be one of the most expensive weeks in U.S. history.

The Senate is expected to pass an $827 billion fiscal stimulus bill, which must then be reconciled with a separate $819 billion House version. The Treasury Department will unveil a sweeping plan to use the remaining $350 billion in the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program. Total cost: at least $1.1 trillion.






For perspective, the total cost of U.S. war funding since 2001 has been about $904 billion, according to a report by Steven Kosiak at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. The fiscal stimulus plan Congress approved last year (remember those rebate checks?) was $168 billion. President George W. Bush’s fiscal year 2009 budget request to Congress was $3.1 trillion. The Congressional Budget Office last month predicted that the federal deficit in 2009 would reach $1.2 trillion--before the addition of a stimulus bill. The entirety of U.S. economic output is about $14.5 trillion.

The scale helps explain the bitter party-line fight over the money (so much for compromise), and why Obama, despite his convincing win at the polls in November and overwhelming approval ratings, feels he still needs to sell America on the plan. He’ll spend Monday doing just that, first in Indiana, then in Washington, where he’ll hold a nationally televised evening press conference. The Senate is expected to hold a procedural vote on its bill Monday evening, with a final vote perhaps Tuesday.

Then comes the real fight: Sorting out the details between the Senate and House bills. In order to obtain buy-in from the three Republicans needed to move the measure forward, Democrats had to concede about $110 billion in cuts, including $40 billion in aid to states for education and other services, and a $25 billion adjustment to a tax package. Among the reductions: funding for energy efficient buildings, health-care IT and health-care subsidies for the unemployed.

Convincing the majority-holding House Democrats to go for such reductions will be sticky. The two pieces of legislation are more fraternal than identical in nature. Both contain a mix of government spending and tax measures to jolt the economy back to life. But the House version contains significantly more money for higher education facilities, broadband access, energy assistance for low-income households, and other items, not to mention aid to states.

How hard will it be? Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, one of the Republicans who sided with Democrats after reaching a compromise on how to spend $780 billion of the money, has called the House version “bloated, expensive and ineffective.”

Also on Tuesday--not Monday, as originally announced--Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will unveil what the government intends to do with the remaining TARP money. Treasury has been mum about the specifics, but industry sources say to expect a multi-faceted approach that involves new capital injections into banks and a mechanism for guaranteeing asset-backed securities of all stripes, new and old, healthy and toxic, to jump-start credit markets. All assistance is expected to come with tighter strings for companies that tap the bailout fund.

There is also likely to be a component to boost the demand for housing and slow down the number of foreclosures. In a research note over the weekend, mortgage industry consultant Howard Glaser said this aspect of the plan could be announced later in the week. Among its potential elements: partial government guarantees for losses on modified loans that go into default again and the purchase of toxic mortgage assets by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

What won’t the Geithner plan include? A request for more money from Congress--at least for now. Lawmakers are unhappy about the way the first $350 billion in TARP funds was put to use. They’re not likely to give the Treasury Department more, even with a new administration in the White House.

In the fall, then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke urged Congress to establish a $700 billion bailout fund for the financial system immediately in order to keep the economy from going over a cliff.

By almost all accounts, the Treasury said “trust us,” then botched it. They were slow to set up the TARP, and once Paulson received unprecedented authority from Congress to determine how the money should be spent, the administration changed course on how it would use it, abandoning a plan to buy toxic assets in favor of injecting capital into financial institutions. Nearly five months later, bank balance sheets remain stressed, lending has not dramatically increased and Geithner finds himself back at the drawing board. Meantime, thanks to a lack of oversight, Congress has little idea what financial firms did with most of the money. The legislation that set up the TARP doesn't require the government to ask most of them for that information.

It’s made the case for stimulus even tougher on Obama, who finds himself in a position similar to Bush: facing economic crisis and looking for Congress to quickly hand over hundreds of billions of dollars without lengthy debate. “Legislation of such magnitude deserves the scrutiny that it’s received over the last month, and it will receive more in the days to come,” Obama said Saturday in his weekly radio address. “But we can’t afford to make ‘perfect’ the enemy of the absolutely necessary.”

Maybe. But it all sounds pretty familiar.


Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Green Brigades Set Sights on White House




















Environmentalists Press Democrats With ‘Non-Negotiable Demands’

Bloomberg, February 3, 2009
By Laura Litvan and Catherine Dodge


Environmental groups are racking up a series of early wins thanks to expanded Democratic majorities in the U.S. Congress. But they aren’t satisfied, and the scope of their agenda may cause headaches for party leaders.

Environmentalists want Congress to cap greenhouse-gas emissions, a proposal meeting resistance from companies such as General Motors Corp. because of its cost. They’re pushing for laws to force public utilities to buy 15 percent of their power from renewable energy sources, an idea opposed by Southern Co. and American Electric Power Co. And they want tougher energy- efficiency standards for cars, buildings and appliances.

“They have high expectations and non-negotiable demands,” James Lucier, an energy analyst at Capital Alpha Partners LLC in Washington, said of the groups, which include the Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth and the League of Conservation Voters.

The tension will soon become apparent. More than 2,000 protesters are planning a March 2 sit-in at a coal-fired plant that produces power for the U.S. Capitol, as part of a drive to get support for climate-change legislation.

While organizations such as the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth are leading the charge, some new, more left-leaning partners are joining the fray.

The antiwar group Code Pink is training some of its ire on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat.

“They keep saying, ‘We want more of a majority,’ so they’ve got a bigger majority now,” said Medea Benjamin, a co- founder of Code Pink. “We expect more concrete results.”



Passage by 2009

Reid and Pelosi say they want to move climate-change legislation through Congress this year. That goal may be more realistic now, with Barack Obama in the White House and Representative Henry Waxman heading the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Waxman, who backs stringent climate-change goals, replaced John Dingell of Michigan -- the auto industry’s closest ally in Congress -- as the panel’s chairman.

Pelosi last month praised Waxman’s plan for his committee to vote by Memorial Day, May 25.

“I share his sense of urgency,” she said in a statement.

That urgency is also felt by environmentalists. With Democrats holding 58 of 100 Senate seats and with a 77-seat advantage in the House of Representatives, they want to seize the moment. And they haven’t been placated by recent victories.

The Senate last month approved a $10 billion conservation plan setting aside more than 2 million acres of natural wilderness and protecting 1,000 miles of scenic rivers.

A portion of the spending in an $819 billion economic- stimulus measure approved by the House last week is geared toward renewable-energy projects, including $6.2 billion to weatherize low-income homes.

Obama Backs California

And Obama last week signed an executive order opening the way for California and other states to limit greenhouse-gas emissions from cars and trucks, standards opposed by GM and Ford Motor Co. as too expensive, especially given the depth of the recession.

Lobbyists at environmental groups say they can build on that momentum to get climate-change legislation through before an international summit in December in Copenhagen with hopes of reaching a global accord. Obama has pledged to cut greenhouse gases by 80 percent from 1990 levels in 2050.

“We’re very hopeful about the prospect of climate-change legislation in 2009,” said Michael Goo, legislative director for the Natural Resources Defense Council’s climate change center.

Renewable Energy

The renewable energy requirement for power-producers also remains a top agenda item for the movement. Senate Democrats dropped the requirement for utilities from a broad-based energy bill in late 2007 to help ease its passage.

Electric utilities such as Atlanta-based Southern Co. and Columbus, Ohio-based American Electric Power lobbied to get the renewable-electricity standard removed. They said the South and Midwest don’t have enough wind and other renewable energy resources to meet the standard.

Analysts say the distressed economy might make many environmental goals unattainable. Gross domestic product contracted at a 3.8 percent annual rate from October through December, the biggest drop since 1982, the government reported on Jan. 30.

Fashioning a “cap-and-trade” system to reduce carbon emissions would come with high costs to manufacturers, said Kevin Book, a senior energy analyst at Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group Inc. in Arlington, Virginia. Such a system would place limits on polluters and require them to obtain a permit for every ton of greenhouse gas pumped into the atmosphere. Those exceeding the limits would have to buy permits from emitters that cut their output of such gases.

‘Rich Man’s Game’

“There’s a real economic challenge to the environmental movement: It’s a rich man’s game,” Book said.

Add to that divisions within the Democratic Party, and passage of legislation this year will be a challenge, said John Fortier, a congressional analyst at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. Democrats from coal-producing or heavy industrial states are split with West Coast Democrats, who align more with stricter environmental standards, he said.

Environmental organizations also aren’t in complete agreement. Last month, the National Wildlife Federation withdrew from a coalition of groups that are fashioning ideas for cap-and-trade legislation. The federation said the ideas coming forward aren’t bold enough.

Republicans Needed

With those obstacles, Representative Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat who was a liaison between Congress and Obama’s presidential-transition team, said it’s too early to predict action this year.

“We’re going to need some Republican support,” Van Hollen said. Cap-and-trade is “an issue where you don’t only have party differences, they’re also regional.”

House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana said Democrats can’t bank on Republican votes.

“The overwhelming majority of Republicans would be very dubious about any global-warming legislation, particularly during such a difficult time for working Americans,” he said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Laura Litvan in Washington at llitvan@bloomberg.net; and Catherine Dodge in Washington, at Cdodge1@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: February 3, 2009 00:01 EST

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Shadows of Burnays in Obama's Propoganda

The 2008 Presidential Campaign reared a myriad of sordid propaganda techniques from fear mongering images of terrorism to enticing depictions of quasi-socialism. Enthralled by repetitious exposure to the vicissitudes of the media, the American population became frozen in a psychosis of "Yes we can...fight al Qaeda and end poverty!"

Neo-propagandists such as David Axelrod of the Barack Obama campaign have fully asserted their mind manipulating tactics by invoking age-old fascist constructs wrapped in the flesh of pop culture. In summer 2008, the Barack Obama campaign released a television advertisement in which a chorus of young children sing praise to Obama. The ad dangerously invokes the subversive malevolence of the fascist youth brigades seen in Hitler's Germany and Maoist China.

In and of itself perhaps the ad could be dismissed as only slightly disingenuous and far from the realm of fascist propaganda, but given the stunning foray of similar youth targeting programs nationwide by the Obama campaign over the last six months such dismissal is
hereto fatuous. As announced by Obama's Chief of Staff, Rham Emmanuel, programs are already in the works for youth ages 18 to 25 to manditorily conscript into "civil service" programs. In concert, this entente of social and youth programs promises big government and sharp changes to the very fabric of American society.



Friday, January 30, 2009

Bush, Cheney, Obama - Blood Relatives?









As reported by the London Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566489/Barack-Obama-and-Dick-Cheney-are-cousins.html


London Telegraph

Barack Obama and Dick Cheney are cousins

Barack Obama and Dick Cheney are cousins
Barack Obama and Dick Cheney: We are family?

The wife of US Vice-President Dick Cheney has revealed that her husband is closely enough related to the Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama to call him "cousin".

Lynne Cheney said that she had made the unlikely discovery of kinship between President George W Bush's hawkish deputy and the charismatic black Illinois senator while researching ancestry for her new memoir, Blue Skies, No Fences.

The men are apparently eighth cousins, but Mrs Cheney said she did not include this in her memoir.

"This is such an amazing American story that one ancestor ... could be responsible down the family lines for lives that have taken such different and varied paths as Dick's and Barack Obama," Mrs Cheney told MSNBC television.

According to Mrs Cheney's spokesman, Senator Obama is a descendant of Mareen Duvall.

The French Huguenot's son married the granddaughter of a Richard Cheney, who arrived in Maryland in the late 1650s from England.

The Vice President's full name is Richard B Cheney.

A spokesman for Senator Obama, who wants to be the first black US president, offered a tongue-in-cheek response.

"Every family has a black sheep," said Bill Burton


Thursday, January 29, 2009

British Soldiers Sue the Crown for Health Damages from Nuclear Testing


Cold War in Paradise
By Marie Jackson
BBC News


Some 50 years ago, thousands of excitable young servicemen landed on the white sands of a Pacific paradise to oversee Britain's testing of early nuclear bombs. But what happened next damaged them mentally and physically for life, some claim, and now they want to be compensated.

Dressed in overalls, white protective gloves and a balaclava, 21-year-old naval cook Dougie Hern was ordered to sit on the beach, back to the bomb, his knees pulled up, eyes closed and hands over his face. A countdown began... three, two, one.

"We saw a bright, brilliant light," he recalls. "It was as if someone had switched a firebar on in your head. It grew brighter and you could see the bones in your hands, like pink X-rays, in front of your closed eyes."

Seconds later, they were ordered to stand and turn towards the blast.

People were knocked off their feet, palm trees shook, birds were blinded and glass shattered as a mushroom cloud rose from the horizon, parting the clouds.

Moments later, the servicemen were told to stand down and resume their duties.



Douglas Hern, 1957
We knew what had happened in Japan - I thought it could not happen here, they would not do it to us
Douglas Hern, former navy cook drafted to Christmas Island

It was all over in about 14 seconds, but Mr Hern, now 72, believes radiation exposure on that day and four others is behind his diabetes, the spurs growing on his sternum, and much worse, the death of his 13-year-old daughter from cancer.

For decades, British ex-servicemen who were stationed on Christmas Island in the South Pacific in the 1950s have been embroiled in legal battles, trying to win recognition for their work and compensation for poor health they say is the result of the nuclear tests.

Their latest attempt to sue the British government goes before the High Court on Wednesday, when the Ministry of Defence (MoD) is expected to argue the claims have been brought too long after the events.

If the MoD loses, the government could face its largest class action yet, involving claims for millions of pounds from 1,000 individuals, say the veterans' lawyers.

Compensation claims by members of the armed forces are not uncommon these days, but the events from the 1950s are unlikely to ever be seen again.

Against a backdrop of de-colonisation and the growing threat of the Cold War, Britain was desperate to establish itself as a nuclear power. The tests, which encompassed six nuclear blasts in all, sent a message of might to the world. But the apparent lack of concern for the wellbeing of servicemen has left shockwaves of anger in some.

"If they gave the order today, there would be wholesale mutiny on the ship," says Mr Hern.

"We had complete faith in our masters. We were trained not to ask questions. We knew what had happened in Japan. I thought it could not happen here. They would not do it to us."

BRITAIN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS
US dropped first atomic bomb used in war on Japanese city of Hiroshima in 1945
About 20,000 servicemen from Britain and overseas involved in tests in Pacific and Maralinga, Australia in 1950s
Six nuclear detonations took place on Christmas Island 1957-8
The island, part of Republic of Kiribati, also known as Kiritimati
Bombs exploded in air, rather than on ground, to try to reduce fallout
Tests led to Britain becoming a thermonuclear power

A job in the armed forces was about being "one of a number", according to Derek Chappell, who had to record data from the H-bomb from about 20 miles away.

Tony Stannage, a sapper in the Royal Engineers brought to the island to build living quarters, roads and the airstrip, says they had no choice.

"It was our duty. If they were going to do another test today, where would they do it?"

The take-it-in-your-stride attitude was so ingrained in Mr Stannage, it was not until a 2002 Christmas Island reunion with fellow servicemen that he spoke of the bombs. "My family and friends might have read about them but they would never have understood," he explains.

For others, the day Britain detonated its first H-bomb over Christmas Island is a story that has been told time and time again, some memories merging, others melting away.

"Everyone in my mind tells a different story but no one is telling lies," says Mr Stannage.

Shorts and sunglasses

The recollections of these three ex-servicemen suggest an island that may have looked like a tropical idyll but in reality was a place to make do and dream of home.

There was little food, land crabs roamed the island, coconut palms were used for fans and clothes were stored in orange boxes.

Orders were to dress only in long-sleeved shirts and full trousers to avoid the blistering heat.

On bomb test days, some servicemen were given the same protective gear as that worn by Dougie Hern, others wore just shorts and sunglasses.

Many complained of being at a loss for things to do, with sport and fishing the only leisure activities.
Map

Mr Chappell, in the RAF, claims in his 50 days on the island, he did just one day's work, the day of the H-bomb.

He is convinced they were there as part of an experiment, a view shared by some fellow servicemen.

"We were lemmings," he says. "There was never any need for that many people to be there."

The Ministry of Defence will not comment on the allegations but did say in a statement that it recognised the "vital contribution" these men played.

It said compensation claims were considered on the basis of whether or not the MoD had a legal liability to pay compensation and were paid if a legal liability was proven.

Leukaemia 'link'

Three years ago, Mr Chappell, now 73, was diagnosed with polycythemia vera - a type of cancer that leads to the over-production of red blood cells - that he believes can be traced back to the 1958 bomb blast.

Links between nuclear testing and premature deaths and cancer among veterans have been contested for years.

The National Radiological Protection Board, now amalgamated into the Health Protection Agency (HPA), has been conducting a study of nuclear test veterans since the 80s.

It compares cancer and mortality rates among servicemen involved in nuclear testing with rates among a control group of servicemen without any nuclear test links.

Dr Colin Muirhead, the HPA's head of epidemiology in the radiation protection section, says his findings showed similar levels of mortality and cancer in both groups.

However, there is "some indication of a raised risk of leukaemia" among those who had worked with nuclear tests, he says.

The veterans may be used to battles. But this one, hindered by funding shortages and legal technicalities, has gone on longer than the Cold War during which it all began. Maybe now there is an end in sight.

Below is a selection of your comments.

My ship the USS Cabildo LSD-16, and several others, were stationed at Christmas Island in 1962. We took the instrument targets out to the blast site and then retrieved them. We went through 31 nuclear blasts, and none of us glow or have diseases. I went on to have three healthy children and 10 grandchildren and none of them have any ill effects. There were 30 more blasts after we left. We experienced the two hydrogen bomb detonations in space from Johnston Island also. One of them went astray and was destroyed shortly after launch.
Darrell Osborn, Forbestown, California, USA

My uncle, Douglas Atkinson, was among the navy personnel in the 50s stationed at Christmas Island. He came home on leave with his back covered in abscesses the size of boiled eggs. My grandmother used to tend them. I am told he was in dreadful pain and discomfort and had to sleep on his stomach. Throughout his life he suffered with his health, and when I was young I remember he used to wear a corset to support his back as he had problems with his spine. Uncle Doug was always a joker, and it was always his goal to have us laughing out loud. I think he was quite remarkable really considering all he'd been through. He, together with his ex-servicemen campaigned for many, many years to try and gain recognition of what took place. Uncle Doug died last year but his wife, my aunty Kath, vowed to him she would carry on the fight. I wish all the ex-servicemen all the luck in the world with their campaign. All they did was serve their country and deserved better.
Diane Smith, Cardiff

My father was on the very first test in Monte Bello Island in 1953 but it rarely gets mentioned as the Christmas Island tests are the most famous. My father suffered with cancer and ill health from 1973 until his death in 1992. He never wanted compensation, like the other veterans he just wants recognition and that this tragedy should never be allowed to happen again.
Nigel Gladstone, Hartlepool

I have studied this issue for years and have known many of those involved in the US atmospheric tests. Epidemiology is the one true science here. Only epidemiology can identify radiation-induced diseases by demonstrating a statistically significant increase in exposed groups which is consistent with similar studies of other exposed groups. The sincere belief of one serviceman or reporter is not scientific proof. They are simply sincerely wrong if the epidemiology does not show an excess of the disease they feel was caused by radiation exposure.
Safety standards existed at the time of atmospheric testing and were essentially safe. These men falsely assume the normal incidence of disease they suffer is linked to radiation. Radiation cannot even cause many of the ailments they have.
Don Jose, Malvern, PA, US

It strikes me as absurd and infuriating that, in the 21st Century, a first-world government cannot admit that it was morally wrong to purposely expose unprotected soldiers to an atomic bomb blast. While the effects of radiation on the human body were not well documented at the time, and perhaps unknown to the enlisted men drafted into these tests, but a modern man should recognize these tests as barbaric, and the survivors as deserving of compensation.
Kyle R Schlichter, Clarksville, TN, US

I am a nurse and a few years ago I looked after a retired New Zealand navy sailor who had witnessed the nuclear tests. He was a very sick man. He and his comrades had been told, apparently, that "this never happened".
David Marriott, Delta, BC, Canada

My husband was in the US Navy and also witnessed several tests. He had lymphoma in the 90s, but has never been a smoker.
Jane Garrett, Erwin, TN USA

My father was a navigator on a British merchant ship in 57 and 58, he died at 52 from multiple myeloma. His death absolutely destroyed our family and even now 20 years later, we cannot believe the callous nature of denial of the suffering of families like ours from the British government. The tragedy means his potential was never reached, his wife, children and grandchildren missed out on his beautiful presence and he died a horrific death after seven years of "keeping up a brave face". He and others like him deserve a medal not some bureaucratic dismissal. Thank you to all of those who are fighting for the dignity of these personnel.
Shelley Barlow, Lismore, NSW, Australia

While it is very difficult to establish a direct health link between these BRAVE troops(that preformed their duty) and the exposure to harmful radiation during this time frame, it is CLEAR with what we know now, that they indeed deserve help from the government.
John Boardman, Dubois, Wyoming, US

Canada had a similar story with some of our troops exposed to Atomic blasts in Nevada. The evidence of permanent damage is extremely weak. As far as I know there was no obvious increase in the expected death rates. And the proof of the pudding is a statistically significant increase in the death rate. Without that support, it is difficult to push or support claims of injury. Personal testimonials cannot be used to support a class action general injury claim.
Alastair James Berry, Vancouver Island

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

We are proud to announce the reopening of NWOBlogger.com

After several months of being incommunicado, we are greatly humbled announce the reopening of NWOBlogger.com. In these coming months we hope to bring you exclusive news reels and articles about the global financial collapse, worldwide police state, the resistance movement, and other pressing issues of our time. To have your story featured on the website please contact nwoblogger@gmail.com - and do respond with comments on each news story. Tune in weekly, for exclusive information about the sordid machinations of the global elite and New World Order agenda.